Acadian Asset Management (AAMI) vs Calamos Strategic Total Return (CSQ)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Acadian Asset Management (AAMI) has outperformed Calamos Strategic Total Return (CSQ) over the past year, gaining 108.2% versus a gain of 6.2%. Over five years, AAMI leads with a +245.9% price change compared with +12.3% for CSQ. Calamos Strategic Total Return is the larger company by market cap ($3.29 billion vs $3.28 billion), about 1.0 times the size.
On valuation, Calamos Strategic Total Return trades at a lower trailing P/E (3.1x vs 32.8x for Acadian Asset Management). Calamos Strategic Total Return offers the higher dividend yield (3.00% vs 0.33%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | AAMI | CSQ |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $92.55 | $20.51 |
| Market cap | $3.28B | $3.29B |
| 1-day change | -1.01% | -0.44% |
| YTD return | +96.91% | +6.82% |
| 1-year return | +108.16% | +6.21% |
| 5-year return | +245.85% | +12.26% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 32.82 | 3.14 |
| Forward P/E | 14.28 | — |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.82 | $6.53 |
| Dividend yield | 0.33% | 3.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.31 | $0.615 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $563.70M | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +11.49% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $80.00M | — |
| Operating margin | 23.43% | — |
| Net margin | 14.19% | — |
| 52-week high | $98.52 | $21.17 |
| 52-week low | $41.47 | $16.41 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -6.06% | -3.12% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | — |
| Avg. price target upside | -1.67% | — |
| Average volume | 424.01K | 185.82K |
| Shares outstanding | 35.49M | 160.37M |
| Employees | 396 | — |
| Sector | Finance | Financial Services |
| Industry | Investment Managers | Asset Management |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- AAMI has outperformed CSQ by 102.0 percentage points over the past year.
- Acadian Asset Management trades at a higher earnings multiple (32.8x vs 3.1x trailing P/E).
- Calamos Strategic Total Return offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.00% vs 0.33%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Acadian Asset Management in Finance and Calamos Strategic Total Return in Financial Services.
About Acadian Asset Management
AAMI stock →Acadian Asset Management Inc. is a publicly owned asset management holding company.
Finance · Investment Managers · 396 employees
About Calamos Strategic Total Return
CSQ stock →Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund is a closed ended balanced mutual fund launched by Calamos Investments LLC. The fund is managed by Calamos Advisors LLC.
Financial Services · Asset Management
AAMI vs CSQ FAQ
Which is bigger, Acadian Asset Management or Calamos Strategic Total Return?
Calamos Strategic Total Return (CSQ) is larger, with a market capitalization of $3.29B compared with $3.28B for Acadian Asset Management (AAMI).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, AAMI or CSQ?
AAMI returned +108.16% over the past 12 months, compared with +6.21% for CSQ (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, AAMI or CSQ?
CSQ has the lower trailing P/E at 3.1, versus 32.8 for AAMI. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Acadian Asset Management or Calamos Strategic Total Return?
Calamos Strategic Total Return has the higher yield at 3.00%, compared with 0.33% for Acadian Asset Management.
Are Acadian Asset Management and Calamos Strategic Total Return in the same industry?
No. Acadian Asset Management is in the Finance sector, while Calamos Strategic Total Return is in Financial Services.