Fiserv (FISV) vs RB Global (RBA)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
RB Global (RBA) has outperformed Fiserv (FISV) over the past year, losing 24.0% versus a loss of 64.2%. Over five years, RBA leads with a +20.7% price change compared with -58.7% for FISV. Fiserv is the larger company by market cap ($24.09 billion vs $14.89 billion), about 1.6 times the size, while RB Global is growing revenue faster (+7.2% vs +3.6%).
On valuation, Fiserv trades at a lower forward P/E (5.7x vs 16.5x for RB Global). RB Global pays a dividend yielding 1.57%, while Fiserv does not currently pay one. Fiserv converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 16.4% versus 9.3%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | FISV | RBA |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $45.31 | $80.40 |
| Market cap | $24.09B | $14.89B |
| 1-day change | -0.37% | -0.80% |
| YTD return | -32.54% | -21.84% |
| 1-year return | -64.24% | -23.98% |
| 5-year return | -58.73% | +20.72% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 8.70 | 34.66 |
| Forward P/E | 5.65 | 16.52 |
| EPS (TTM) | $5.21 | $2.32 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.57% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $1.26 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $21.19B | $4.59B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +3.60% | +7.15% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $3.48B | $428.40M |
| Operating margin | 27.45% | 15.54% |
| Net margin | 16.42% | 9.33% |
| 52-week high | $128.78 | $119.33 |
| 52-week low | $43.87 | $78.05 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -64.82% | -32.62% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +31.49% | +60.00% |
| Average volume | 7.16M | 1.68M |
| Shares outstanding | 531.77M | 185.20M |
| Employees | — | 8,000 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Business Services | Business Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- RBA has outperformed FISV by 40.3 percentage points over the past year.
- RB Global trades at a higher earnings multiple (34.7x vs 8.7x trailing P/E).
- RB Global offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.57% vs 0.00%).
- Fiserv is more profitable, keeping 16.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 9.3 cents for RB Global.
About RB Global
RBA stock →RB Global, Inc. operates a marketplace that provides insights, services, and transaction solutions for buyers and sellers of commercial assets and vehicles worldwide.
Consumer Discretionary · Business Services · 8,000 employees
FISV vs RBA FAQ
Which is bigger, Fiserv or RB Global?
Fiserv (FISV) is larger, with a market capitalization of $24.09B compared with $14.89B for RB Global (RBA).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, FISV or RBA?
RBA returned -23.98% over the past 12 months, compared with -64.24% for FISV (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, FISV or RBA?
FISV has the lower trailing P/E at 8.7, versus 34.7 for RBA. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Fiserv or RB Global?
RB Global pays a dividend yielding 1.57%, while Fiserv does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Fiserv and RB Global in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Business Services industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.