Healthcare Realty (HR) vs Phillips Edison (PECO)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Phillips Edison (PECO) has outperformed Healthcare Realty (HR) over the past year, gaining 11.0% versus a loss of 2.8%. Over five years, PECO leads with a +19.0% price change compared with -47.3% for HR. Healthcare Realty is the larger company by market cap ($5.96 billion vs $5.29 billion), about 1.1 times the size, while Phillips Edison is growing revenue faster (+9.9% vs -6.9%).
On valuation, Phillips Edison trades at a lower forward P/E (55.1x vs 245.6x for Healthcare Realty). Healthcare Realty offers the higher dividend yield (5.58% vs 3.44%). Phillips Edison converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 15.3% versus -20.8%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | HR | PECO |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $17.19 | $37.39 |
| Market cap | $5.96B | $5.29B |
| 1-day change | +1.84% | +0.92% |
| YTD return | +1.42% | +5.12% |
| 1-year return | -2.77% | +11.05% |
| 5-year return | -47.25% | +18.96% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | — | 32.80 |
| Forward P/E | 245.57 | 55.14 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-0.26 | $1.14 |
| Dividend yield | 5.58% | 3.44% |
| Annual dividend | $0.96 | $1.29 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $1.18B | $726.59M |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -6.92% | +9.86% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-246.07M | $111.30M |
| Net margin | -20.84% | 15.32% |
| 52-week high | $22.04 | $44.38 |
| 52-week low | $16.31 | $32.98 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -22.01% | -15.74% |
| Analyst consensus | none | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +24.61% | +16.66% |
| Average volume | 3.88M | 963.60K |
| Shares outstanding | 342.72M | 128.70M |
| Employees | 539 | 320 |
| Sector | Real Estate | Real Estate |
| Industry | Real Estate Investment Trusts | Real Estate Investment Trusts |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- PECO has outperformed HR by 13.8 percentage points over the past year.
- Healthcare Realty offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (5.58% vs 3.44%).
- Phillips Edison is more profitable, keeping 15.3 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -20.8 cents for Healthcare Realty.
- Phillips Edison grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+9.86% vs -6.92%).
About Healthcare Realty
HR stock →Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated is a real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns and operates medical outpatient buildings primarily located around market-leading hospital campuses. The Company selectively grows its portfolio through property acquisition and development.
Real Estate · Real Estate Investment Trusts · 539 employees
About Phillips Edison
PECO stock →Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) is one of the nation's largest owners and operators of high-quality, grocery-anchored neighborhood shopping centers.
Real Estate · Real Estate Investment Trusts · 320 employees
HR vs PECO FAQ
Which is bigger, Healthcare Realty or Phillips Edison?
Healthcare Realty (HR) is larger, with a market capitalization of $5.96B compared with $5.29B for Phillips Edison (PECO).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, HR or PECO?
PECO returned +11.05% over the past 12 months, compared with -2.77% for HR (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Healthcare Realty or Phillips Edison?
Healthcare Realty has the higher yield at 5.58%, compared with 3.44% for Phillips Edison.
Are Healthcare Realty and Phillips Edison in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry within the Real Estate sector.