MetaCap

International Seaways (INSW) vs Viking (VIK)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

International Seaways (INSW) has outperformed Viking (VIK) over the past year, gaining 163.7% versus a gain of 36.6%. Viking is the larger company by market cap ($35.98 billion vs $5.79 billion), about 6.2 times the size. On valuation, International Seaways trades at a lower forward P/E (18.1x vs 18.4x for Viking).

International Seaways pays a dividend yielding 0.41%, while Viking does not currently pay one. International Seaways converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 36.7% versus 17.7%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

INSW+163.68%VIK+36.57%
+172%+80%-12%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
INSW+108.19%VIK+180.21%
+280%+108%-64%
Apr 29, 20245 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

INSW versus VIK key metrics
MetricINSWVIK
Share price$116.94$80.57
Market cap$5.79B$35.98B
1-day change+0.41%-0.88%
YTD return+140.87%+13.79%
1-year return+163.68%+36.57%
5-year return+585.46%—
P/E ratio (TTM)7.4826.77
Forward P/E18.1418.38
EPS (TTM)$15.64$3.01
Dividend yield0.41%0.00%
Annual dividend$0.48$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$843.30M$6.50B
Revenue growth (YoY)-11.38%+21.89%
Net income (latest FY)$309.26M$1.15B
Gross margin—43.34%
Operating margin40.96%23.10%
Net margin36.67%17.65%
52-week high$120.00$110.09
52-week low$42.26$56.37
Distance from 52-week high-2.55%-26.82%
Analyst consensusstrong_buystrong_buy
Avg. price target upside-3.65%+35.98%
Average volume622.41K3.45M
Shares outstanding49.53M318.87M
Employees2,83713,000
SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
IndustryMarine TransportationMarine Transportation

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Viking is about 6.2 times larger than International Seaways by market value ($35.98B vs $5.79B).
  • INSW has outperformed VIK by 127.1 percentage points over the past year.
  • Viking trades at a higher earnings multiple (26.8x vs 7.5x trailing P/E).
  • International Seaways is more profitable, keeping 36.7 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 17.7 cents for Viking.
  • Viking grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+21.89% vs -11.38%).

About International Seaways

INSW stock →

International Seaways, Inc. owns and operates a fleet of oceangoing vessels for the transportation of crude oil and petroleum products in the international flag trade.

Consumer Discretionary · Marine Transportation · 2,837 employees

About Viking

VIK stock →

Viking Holdings Ltd focused on providing passenger cruises in North America, the United Kingdom, and internationally. It operates through the River and Ocean segments.

Consumer Discretionary · Marine Transportation · 13,000 employees

INSW vs VIK FAQ

Which is bigger, International Seaways or Viking?

Viking (VIK) is larger, with a market capitalization of $35.98B compared with $5.79B for International Seaways (INSW).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, INSW or VIK?

INSW returned +163.68% over the past 12 months, compared with +36.57% for VIK (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, INSW or VIK?

INSW has the lower trailing P/E at 7.5, versus 26.8 for VIK. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, International Seaways or Viking?

International Seaways pays a dividend yielding 0.41%, while Viking does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are International Seaways and Viking in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Marine Transportation industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.

More comparisons