MetaCap

Kimberly-Clark (KMB) vs Procter & Gamble (PG)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.

Summary

Procter & Gamble (PG) has outperformed Kimberly-Clark (KMB) over the past year, losing 3.1% versus a loss of 21.1%. Over five years, PG leads with a +2.4% price change compared with -27.6% for KMB. Procter & Gamble is the larger company by market cap ($343.34 billion vs $32.09 billion), about 10.7 times the size.

On valuation, Kimberly-Clark trades at a lower forward P/E (12.9x vs 20.0x for Procter & Gamble). Kimberly-Clark offers the higher dividend yield (5.27% vs 2.88%). Procter & Gamble converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 18.4% versus 12.3%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

KMB-19.96%PG-1.72%
+13%-6%-25%
Oct 6, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
KMB-27.39%PG+4.30%
+29%-1%-32%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

KMB versus PG key metrics
MetricKMBPG
Share price$96.48$147.82
Market cap$32.09B$343.34B
1-day change-0.30%-0.40%
YTD return-4.37%+3.15%
1-year return-21.13%-3.09%
5-year return-27.64%+2.35%
P/E ratio (TTM)19.0322.33
Forward P/E12.9219.99
EPS (TTM)$5.07$6.62
Dividend yield5.27%2.88%
Annual dividend$5.08$4.26
Revenue (latest FY)$16.45B$87.03B
Revenue growth (YoY)-2.13%+3.26%
Net income (latest FY)$2.02B$16.05B
Gross margin36.01%50.18%
Operating margin14.29%22.69%
Net margin12.29%18.44%
52-week high$123.09$167.25
52-week low$92.42$137.62
Distance from 52-week high-21.62%-11.62%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+20.10%+8.77%
Average volume3.90M8.60M
Shares outstanding332.58M2.32B
Employees36,000104,000
SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
IndustryContainers/PackagingPackage Goods/Cosmetics

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Procter & Gamble is about 10.7 times larger than Kimberly-Clark by market value ($343.34B vs $32.09B).
  • PG has outperformed KMB by 18.0 percentage points over the past year.
  • Kimberly-Clark offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (5.27% vs 2.88%).
  • Procter & Gamble is more profitable, keeping 18.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 12.3 cents for Kimberly-Clark.
  • Procter & Gamble grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+3.26% vs -2.13%).

About Kimberly-Clark

KMB stock →

Kimberly-Clark Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, manufactures and markets personal care products in the United States. It operates in two segments, North America and International Personal Care.

Consumer Discretionary · Containers/Packaging · 36,000 employees

About Procter & Gamble

PG stock →

The Procter & Gamble Company provides branded consumer packaged goods worldwide. It operates through five segments: Beauty; Grooming; Health Care; Fabric & Home Care; and Baby, Feminine & Family Care.

Consumer Discretionary · Package Goods/Cosmetics · 104,000 employees

KMB vs PG FAQ

Which is bigger, Kimberly-Clark or Procter & Gamble?

Procter & Gamble (PG) is larger, with a market capitalization of $343.34B compared with $32.09B for Kimberly-Clark (KMB).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, KMB or PG?

PG returned -3.09% over the past 12 months, compared with -21.13% for KMB (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, KMB or PG?

KMB has the lower trailing P/E at 19.0, versus 22.3 for PG. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Kimberly-Clark or Procter & Gamble?

Kimberly-Clark has the higher yield at 5.27%, compared with 2.88% for Procter & Gamble.

Are Kimberly-Clark and Procter & Gamble in the same industry?

Both are in the Consumer Discretionary sector, but in different industries: Containers/Packaging for Kimberly-Clark and Package Goods/Cosmetics for Procter & Gamble.

More comparisons