MGIC Investment (MTG) vs Radian Group (RDN)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
MGIC Investment (MTG) has outperformed Radian Group (RDN) over the past year, gaining 0.1% versus a loss of 2.8%. Over five years, MTG leads with a +65.4% price change compared with +38.9% for RDN. MGIC Investment is the larger company by market cap ($5.55 billion vs $4.46 billion), about 1.2 times the size.
On valuation, Radian Group trades at a lower forward P/E (6.5x vs 7.8x for MGIC Investment). Radian Group offers the higher dividend yield (3.03% vs 2.22%). MGIC Investment converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 60.8% versus 48.7%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | MTG | RDN |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $27.07 | $33.70 |
| Market cap | $5.55B | $4.46B |
| 1-day change | -1.06% | -1.20% |
| YTD return | -7.36% | -6.36% |
| 1-year return | +0.11% | -2.77% |
| 5-year return | +65.36% | +38.85% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 8.46 | 8.32 |
| Forward P/E | 7.77 | 6.45 |
| EPS (TTM) | $3.20 | $4.05 |
| Dividend yield | 2.22% | 3.03% |
| Annual dividend | $0.60 | $1.02 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $1.21B | $1.20B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +0.49% | -0.76% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $738.35M | $582.64M |
| Net margin | 60.84% | 48.67% |
| 52-week high | $31.89 | $41.05 |
| 52-week low | $24.69 | $30.53 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -15.11% | -17.90% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +16.00% | +32.55% |
| Average volume | 2.00M | 1.38M |
| Shares outstanding | 205.12M | 132.30M |
| Employees | 542 | 900 |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Property-Casualty Insurers | Property-Casualty Insurers |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- MGIC Investment is more profitable, keeping 60.8 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 48.7 cents for Radian Group.
About MGIC Investment
MTG stock →MGIC Investment Corporation, through its subsidiaries, provides private mortgage insurance, other mortgage credit risk management solutions, and ancillary services in the United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and Guam. The company offers primary insurance that provides mortgage default protection on individual loans, as well as covers unpaid loan principal, delinquent interest, and various expenses associated with the default and subsequent foreclosure on the mortgage or sale of the underlying property.
Finance · Property-Casualty Insurers · 542 employees
About Radian Group
RDN stock →Radian Group Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides mortgage insurance in the United States. It aggregates, manages, and distributes mortgage credit risk for the benefit of mortgage lending institutions and mortgage credit investors through private mortgage insurance on residential first-lien mortgage loans.
Finance · Property-Casualty Insurers · 900 employees
MTG vs RDN FAQ
Which is bigger, MGIC Investment or Radian Group?
MGIC Investment (MTG) is larger, with a market capitalization of $5.55B compared with $4.46B for Radian Group (RDN).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, MTG or RDN?
MTG returned +0.11% over the past 12 months, compared with -2.77% for RDN (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, MTG or RDN?
RDN has the lower trailing P/E at 8.3, versus 8.5 for MTG. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, MGIC Investment or Radian Group?
Radian Group has the higher yield at 3.03%, compared with 2.22% for MGIC Investment.
Are MGIC Investment and Radian Group in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Property-Casualty Insurers industry within the Finance sector.