TransUnion (TRU) vs TeraWulf (WULF)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
TeraWulf (WULF) has outperformed TransUnion (TRU) over the past year, gaining 19.0% versus a loss of 17.7%. Over five years, TRU leads with a -45.7% price change compared with -52.1% for WULF. TransUnion is the larger company by market cap ($12.00 billion vs $6.65 billion), about 1.8 times the size, while TeraWulf is growing revenue faster (+20.3% vs +9.4%).
TransUnion pays a dividend yielding 0.38%, while TeraWulf does not currently pay one. TransUnion converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 10.0% versus -392.6%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | TRU | WULF |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $62.63 | $13.34 |
| Market cap | $12.00B | $6.65B |
| 1-day change | -0.31% | -7.40% |
| YTD return | -26.74% | +25.33% |
| 1-year return | -17.72% | +19.01% |
| 5-year return | -45.74% | -52.08% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 16.52 | — |
| Forward P/E | 11.29 | — |
| EPS (TTM) | $3.79 | $-4.43 |
| Dividend yield | 0.38% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.24 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $4.58B | $168.46M |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +9.38% | +20.28% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $455.40M | $-661.42M |
| Gross margin | — | 39.21% |
| Operating margin | 18.74% | -110.54% |
| Net margin | 9.95% | -392.64% |
| 52-week high | $89.12 | $29.84 |
| 52-week low | $60.96 | $10.47 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -29.73% | -55.31% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +49.27% | +151.07% |
| Average volume | 2.33M | 31.10M |
| Shares outstanding | 191.60M | 498.97M |
| Employees | 13,000 | 141 |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Finance: Consumer Services | Finance: Consumer Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- WULF has outperformed TRU by 36.7 percentage points over the past year.
- TransUnion is more profitable, keeping 10.0 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -392.6 cents for TeraWulf.
- TeraWulf grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+20.28% vs +9.38%).
About TransUnion
TRU stock →TransUnion operates as a global consumer credit reporting agency that provides risk and information solutions. The company operates in two segments, U.S.
Finance · Finance: Consumer Services · 13,000 employees
About TeraWulf
WULF stock →TeraWulf Inc., together with its subsidiaries, owns, develops, operates digital infrastructure in the United States. It also develops and operates bitcoin mining facilities for bitcoin mining and high-performance computing workloads, leveraging clean, cost-effective, and reliable energy.
Finance · Finance: Consumer Services · 141 employees
TRU vs WULF FAQ
Which is bigger, TransUnion or TeraWulf?
TransUnion (TRU) is larger, with a market capitalization of $12.00B compared with $6.65B for TeraWulf (WULF).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, TRU or WULF?
WULF returned +19.01% over the past 12 months, compared with -17.72% for TRU (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, TransUnion or TeraWulf?
TransUnion pays a dividend yielding 0.38%, while TeraWulf does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are TransUnion and TeraWulf in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Finance: Consumer Services industry within the Finance sector.