MetaCap

Essential Properties Realty (EPRT) vs Macerich (MAC)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Macerich (MAC) has outperformed Essential Properties Realty (EPRT) over the past year, gaining 27.6% versus a loss of 14.6%. Over five years, MAC leads with a +25.4% price change compared with -14.1% for EPRT. Macerich is the larger company by market cap ($6.55 billion vs $5.41 billion), about 1.2 times the size, while Essential Properties Realty is growing revenue faster (+24.8% vs +10.4%).

On valuation, Essential Properties Realty trades at a lower forward P/E (18.0x vs 161.4x for Macerich). Essential Properties Realty offers the higher dividend yield (4.97% vs 3.06%). Essential Properties Realty converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 45.1% versus -19.4%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

EPRT-14.64%MAC+27.60%
+56%+19%-18%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
EPRT-10.92%MAC+26.73%
+53%-4%-60%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

EPRT versus MAC key metrics
MetricEPRTMAC
Share price$24.95$22.19
Market cap$5.41B$6.55B
1-day change-2.46%-3.31%
YTD return-15.88%+20.21%
1-year return-14.64%+27.60%
5-year return-14.11%+25.37%
P/E ratio (TTM)19.80—
Forward P/E18.04161.38
EPS (TTM)$1.26$-0.63
Dividend yield4.97%3.06%
Annual dividend$1.24$0.68
Revenue (latest FY)$561.22M$1.01B
Revenue growth (YoY)+24.82%+10.43%
Net income (latest FY)$253.01M$-197.15M
Operating margin64.13%—
Net margin45.08%-19.44%
52-week high$34.73$26.68
52-week low$24.94$16.03
Distance from 52-week high-28.16%-16.83%
Analyst consensusstrong_buybuy
Avg. price target upside+44.89%+21.68%
Average volume1.87M3.29M
Shares outstanding216.27M283.56M
Employees56596
SectorReal EstateReal Estate
IndustryReal Estate Investment TrustsReal Estate Investment Trusts

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • MAC has outperformed EPRT by 42.2 percentage points over the past year.
  • Essential Properties Realty offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (4.97% vs 3.06%).
  • Essential Properties Realty is more profitable, keeping 45.1 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -19.4 cents for Macerich.
  • Essential Properties Realty grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+24.82% vs +10.43%).

About Essential Properties Realty

EPRT stock →

Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. is an internally managed REIT that acquires, owns and manages primarily single-tenant properties that are net leased on a long-term basis to companies operating service-oriented or experience-based businesses.

Real Estate · Real Estate Investment Trusts · 56 employees

About Macerich

MAC stock →

The Macerich Company is a fully integrated, self-managed, self-administered real estate investment trust (REIT). As a leading owner, operator, and developer of high-quality retail real estate in densely populated and attractive U.S.

Real Estate · Real Estate Investment Trusts · 596 employees

EPRT vs MAC FAQ

Which is bigger, Essential Properties Realty or Macerich?

Macerich (MAC) is larger, with a market capitalization of $6.55B compared with $5.41B for Essential Properties Realty (EPRT).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, EPRT or MAC?

MAC returned +27.60% over the past 12 months, compared with -14.64% for EPRT (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which pays a higher dividend, Essential Properties Realty or Macerich?

Essential Properties Realty has the higher yield at 4.97%, compared with 3.06% for Macerich.

Are Essential Properties Realty and Macerich in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry within the Real Estate sector.

More comparisons