Global Payments (GPN) vs RB Global (RBA)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Global Payments (GPN) has outperformed RB Global (RBA) over the past year, losing 6.5% versus a loss of 20.5%. Over five years, RBA leads with a +26.2% price change compared with -48.5% for GPN. Global Payments is the larger company by market cap ($21.90 billion vs $15.56 billion), about 1.4 times the size, while RB Global is growing revenue faster (+7.2% vs -0.4%).
On valuation, Global Payments trades at a lower forward P/E (5.2x vs 17.3x for RB Global). RB Global offers the higher dividend yield (1.50% vs 1.21%). Global Payments converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 18.2% versus 9.3%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | GPN | RBA |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $82.77 | $84.03 |
| Market cap | $21.90B | $15.56B |
| 1-day change | +2.08% | +4.51% |
| YTD return | +6.94% | -18.31% |
| 1-year return | -6.51% | -20.49% |
| 5-year return | -48.46% | +26.17% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 38.86 | 36.22 |
| Forward P/E | 5.17 | 17.34 |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.13 | $2.32 |
| Dividend yield | 1.21% | 1.50% |
| Annual dividend | $1.00 | $1.26 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $7.71B | $4.59B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -0.39% | +7.15% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $1.40B | $428.40M |
| Gross margin | 72.57% | — |
| Operating margin | 22.77% | 15.54% |
| Net margin | 18.17% | 9.33% |
| 52-week high | $95.88 | $119.33 |
| 52-week low | $61.16 | $78.05 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -13.67% | -29.58% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +26.86% | +53.09% |
| Average volume | 2.79M | 1.72M |
| Shares outstanding | 264.62M | 185.20M |
| Employees | 26,000 | 8,000 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Business Services | Business Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- GPN has outperformed RBA by 14.0 percentage points over the past year.
- Global Payments is more profitable, keeping 18.2 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 9.3 cents for RB Global.
- RB Global grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+7.15% vs -0.39%).
About Global Payments
GPN stock →Global Payments Inc. provides payment technology and software solutions for card, check, and digital-based payments in the Americas, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific.
Consumer Discretionary · Business Services · 26,000 employees
About RB Global
RBA stock →RB Global, Inc. operates a marketplace that provides insights, services, and transaction solutions for buyers and sellers of commercial assets and vehicles worldwide.
Consumer Discretionary · Business Services · 8,000 employees
GPN vs RBA FAQ
Which is bigger, Global Payments or RB Global?
Global Payments (GPN) is larger, with a market capitalization of $21.90B compared with $15.56B for RB Global (RBA).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, GPN or RBA?
GPN returned -6.51% over the past 12 months, compared with -20.49% for RBA (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, GPN or RBA?
RBA has the lower trailing P/E at 36.2, versus 38.9 for GPN. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Global Payments or RB Global?
RB Global has the higher yield at 1.50%, compared with 1.21% for Global Payments.
Are Global Payments and RB Global in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Business Services industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.