MetaCap

Acadia Realty (AKR) vs CoreCivic (CXW)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

CoreCivic (CXW) has outperformed Acadia Realty (AKR) over the past year, gaining 74.5% versus a loss of 7.7%. Over five years, CXW leads with a +247.6% price change compared with -18.9% for AKR. CoreCivic is the larger company by market cap ($3.30 billion vs $2.66 billion), about 1.2 times the size, while Acadia Realty is growing revenue faster (+14.2% vs +12.7%).

On valuation, CoreCivic trades at a lower forward P/E (13.8x vs 48.6x for Acadia Realty). Acadia Realty pays a dividend yielding 4.39%, while CoreCivic does not currently pay one. CoreCivic converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 5.3% versus 4.1%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

AKR-7.67%CXW+74.45%
+95%+38%-19%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
AKR-15.64%CXW+247.98%
+291%+116%-58%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

AKR versus CXW key metrics
MetricAKRCXW
Share price$18.23$33.40
Market cap$2.66B$3.30B
1-day change+0.28%+2.09%
YTD return-11.49%+71.17%
1-year return-7.67%+74.45%
5-year return-18.95%+247.61%
P/E ratio (TTM)53.6226.72
Forward P/E48.6113.81
EPS (TTM)$0.34$1.25
Dividend yield4.39%0.00%
Annual dividend$0.80$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$410.76M$2.21B
Revenue growth (YoY)+14.20%+12.72%
Net income (latest FY)$16.90M$116.50M
Operating margin12.03%—
Net margin4.11%5.27%
52-week high$23.03$36.55
52-week low$17.98$15.74
Distance from 52-week high-20.84%-8.63%
Analyst consensusstrong_buystrong_buy
Avg. price target upside+31.65%+25.17%
Average volume1.37M1.72M
Shares outstanding137.33M98.89M
Employees13813,651
SectorReal EstateReal Estate
IndustryReal Estate Investment TrustsReal Estate Investment Trusts

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • CXW has outperformed AKR by 82.1 percentage points over the past year.
  • Acadia Realty trades at a higher earnings multiple (53.6x vs 26.7x trailing P/E).
  • Acadia Realty offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (4.39% vs 0.00%).

About Acadia Realty

AKR stock →

Acadia Realty Trust is an equity real estate investment trust focused on delivering long-term, profitable growth. Acadia owns and operates a high-quality real estate portfolio of street and open-air retail properties in the nation's most dynamic retail corridors, along with an investment management platform that targets opportunistic and value-add investments through its institutional co-investment vehicles.

Real Estate · Real Estate Investment Trusts · 138 employees

About CoreCivic

CXW stock →

CoreCivic, Inc. owns and operates partnership correctional, detention, and residential reentry facilities in the United States.

Real Estate · Real Estate Investment Trusts · 13,651 employees

AKR vs CXW FAQ

Which is bigger, Acadia Realty or CoreCivic?

CoreCivic (CXW) is larger, with a market capitalization of $3.30B compared with $2.66B for Acadia Realty (AKR).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, AKR or CXW?

CXW returned +74.45% over the past 12 months, compared with -7.67% for AKR (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, AKR or CXW?

CXW has the lower trailing P/E at 26.7, versus 53.6 for AKR. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Acadia Realty or CoreCivic?

Acadia Realty pays a dividend yielding 4.39%, while CoreCivic does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Acadia Realty and CoreCivic in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry within the Real Estate sector.

More comparisons