MetaCap

Camden Property (CPT) vs EastGroup Properties (EGP)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

EastGroup Properties (EGP) has outperformed Camden Property (CPT) over the past year, gaining 10.8% versus a loss of 7.3%. Over five years, EGP leads with a +4.6% price change compared with -38.9% for CPT. Camden Property is the larger company by market cap ($11.09 billion vs $10.25 billion), about 1.1 times the size.

On valuation, EastGroup Properties trades at a lower forward P/E (34.3x vs 87.9x for Camden Property). Camden Property offers the higher dividend yield (4.41% vs 3.36%). Camden Property converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 2964.9% versus 35.7%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

CPT-7.32%EGP+10.77%
+32%+11%-9%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
CPT-36.48%EGP+10.43%
+36%-6%-48%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

CPT versus EGP key metrics
MetricCPTEGP
Share price$95.80$190.55
Market cap$11.09B$10.25B
1-day change-1.89%-1.20%
YTD return-12.97%+6.97%
1-year return-7.32%+10.77%
5-year return-38.95%+4.63%
P/E ratio (TTM)31.6233.43
Forward P/E87.8934.28
EPS (TTM)$3.03$5.70
Dividend yield4.41%3.36%
Annual dividend$4.22$6.40
Revenue (latest FY)$12.97M$721.34M
Revenue growth (YoY)+81.69%+12.67%
Net income (latest FY)$384.46M$257.46M
Gross margin-4270.40%—
Net margin2964.93%35.69%
52-week high$119.81$226.71
52-week low$95.45$166.11
Distance from 52-week high-20.04%-15.95%
Analyst consensusholdbuy
Avg. price target upside+20.48%+19.57%
Average volume1.02M483.42K
Shares outstanding115.73M53.77M
Employees1,640103
SectorReal EstateReal Estate
IndustryReal Estate Investment TrustsReal Estate Investment Trusts

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • EGP has outperformed CPT by 18.1 percentage points over the past year.
  • Camden Property offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (4.41% vs 3.36%).
  • Camden Property is more profitable, keeping 2964.9 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 35.7 cents for EastGroup Properties.
  • Camden Property grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+81.69% vs +12.67%).

About Camden Property

CPT stock →

Camden Property Trust, an S&P 500 Company, is a real estate company primarily engaged in the ownership, management, development, redevelopment, acquisition, and construction of multifamily apartment communities. Camden owns and operates 173 properties containing 58,811 apartment homes across the United States.

Real Estate · Real Estate Investment Trusts · 1,640 employees

About EastGroup Properties

EGP stock →

EastGroup Properties, Inc. a member of the S&P Mid-Cap 400 and Russell 2000 Indexes.

Real Estate · Real Estate Investment Trusts · 103 employees

CPT vs EGP FAQ

Which is bigger, Camden Property or EastGroup Properties?

Camden Property (CPT) is larger, with a market capitalization of $11.09B compared with $10.25B for EastGroup Properties (EGP).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, CPT or EGP?

EGP returned +10.77% over the past 12 months, compared with -7.32% for CPT (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, CPT or EGP?

CPT has the lower trailing P/E at 31.6, versus 33.4 for EGP. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Camden Property or EastGroup Properties?

Camden Property has the higher yield at 4.41%, compared with 3.36% for EastGroup Properties.

Are Camden Property and EastGroup Properties in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry within the Real Estate sector.

More comparisons